John Carter

John Carter: Hollywood’s Costliest Box Office Flop That Shattered Careers and Cost Disney $265 Million

In 2012, one of the most expensive and ambitious projects in Hollywood history, John Carter, was released to a thundering silence at the box office, becoming what is still regarded as the biggest box office bomb ever. With a staggering production budget exceeding $300 million and an equally hefty marketing spend, the film not only failed to meet expectations but also cost Walt Disney Studios a colossal $265 million in losses— a financial blow that led to the firing of the studio head and forever altered the careers of several key players involved. Directed by Andrew Stanton, known for his animated classics Finding Nemo and WALL-E, John Carter was a live-action adaptation of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ 1912 science fiction novel A Princess of Mars, the first in his Barsoom series. The film followed the adventures of John Carter, a Confederate Civil War veteran transported to Mars, where he becomes embroiled in an interplanetary conflict. With an all-star cast led by Taylor Kitsch as the titular hero, the film boasted cutting-edge visual effects and a sweeping, grandiose narrative meant to compete with the era’s biggest blockbusters. However, despite the hype, John Carter underperformed severely. Its global gross totaled just $284 million, far below the astronomical costs of production and marketing. When tax deductions and other expenses were accounted for, Disney’s losses were estimated to be as high as $265 million, a sum that remains unparalleled in Hollywood history. Some reports suggested that the losses could have been closer to $150 million, but either way, the film was a financial disaster for the studio. The Aftermath: Disney’s Shake-Up and the Firing of Rich Ross John Carter was Disney’s marquee release for 2012, intended to be the cornerstone of a new film franchise. When the film flopped, the repercussions were swift and severe. Rich Ross, the head of Walt Disney Studios at the time, was forced to resign after the film’s disastrous performance. Reports from that period suggested that Ross tried to shift the blame for the failure onto Pixar, the animation studio that had been absorbed into Disney. This move alienated both Pixar executives and Disney’s creative leadership, causing a rift that would take years to mend. While John Carter’s failure was a blow to Disney’s overall film strategy, it coincided with the enormous success of The Avengers—a Marvel Studios film released in the same year, and a massive box office hit that redefined the superhero genre. The contrast between John Carter’s failure and The Avengers’ success was stark, further underscoring the deep impact of the loss on Disney’s bottom line and image. The Vanishing Director and the Fallout for the Cast For director Andrew Stanton, John Carter’s failure marked a dramatic and painful turning point in his career. After the film’s release, Stanton retreated from the public eye, reportedly going through a “true ‘Lost Weekend’” to cope with the crushing disappointment. While he would later return to Pixar to direct Finding Dory, Stanton never attempted another live-action project again until his recent venture, In the Blink of an Eye. It was clear that the failure of John Carter left a lasting impact on him, and his confidence in the live-action genre seemed permanently shaken. The film’s cast also suffered significant career setbacks. Taylor Kitsch, who starred as John Carter, saw his rising star dim after the film’s failure. Despite a strong performance in the acclaimed Friday Night Lights TV series, Kitsch struggled to land major roles in the years following John Carter. His film career failed to gain momentum, and he was relegated to lower-profile roles, although he has recently begun to make a modest comeback in TV projects. Perhaps the most difficult fallout was for Lynn Collins, who played the female lead, Dejah Thoris. In the wake of the film’s failure, Collins was reportedly advised by her publicist to “disappear for a while” to avoid negative attention, a move that many saw as unfair and sexist. The blame for the film’s failure was largely placed on Kitsch and the film’s marketing, yet Collins felt that she was unfairly sidelined. Her career suffered greatly—her role in The Wolverine was cut down significantly, and she didn’t appear in another major film for three years. It wasn’t until 2016 that she starred in Lost in the Sun, an indie film, and in 2021-2022, she returned to the spotlight with a recurring role on The Walking Dead. A Cautionary Tale for Hollywood The disaster that was John Carter has become a cautionary tale in Hollywood, highlighting the risks associated with massive budgets and high expectations. The film’s failure illustrates how even the most talented directors and stars, and the most lavish production efforts, can fall flat if not paired with a compelling story, effective marketing, and audience demand. The film’s financial failure, combined with its troubled legacy, marked the beginning of a more cautious approach in Hollywood when it comes to high-budget films. Studios learned that, despite the allure of huge franchises and visual spectacles, audiences are not always guaranteed to show up, especially if a film doesn’t connect with viewers on a deeper level. Today, John Carter remains an iconic example of the dangers of over-investing in a project without considering the broader market context and audience appeal. While it’s remembered as a colossal flop, it has also earned a certain cult following, with fans of the source material appreciating the effort that went into the film’s ambitious world-building. In the end, John Carter is a symbol of the high-stakes gamble that is the modern film industry, where big budgets, massive expectations, and the desire for franchise-building can result in massive losses when things go wrong.

Read More
Paranormal Activity

How Paranormal Activity Became One of the Most Profitable Movies Ever

In the world of cinema, few films have had as significant an impact on the horror genre and the industry as a whole as Paranormal Activity. Shot in just seven days with a meager budget of $15,000, this film went on to become one of the most profitable movies of all time, raking in a staggering $194 million worldwide. The Lessons Learned by Jason Blum Producer Jason Blum’s journey to Paranormal Activity was shaped by past experiences. Earlier in his career at Miramax, he famously passed on the opportunity to distribute The Blair Witch Project, a decision that haunted him as he ventured into independent film production. This lesson motivated Blum to adopt a low-budget model that could yield high returns, particularly in the horror genre, where a smaller investment often leads to substantial profits. With a clear vision, Blum collaborated with Israeli filmmaker Oren Peli, who wrote, directed, and edited the film himself. Peli’s approach echoed the success of The Blair Witch Project, utilizing inexpensive digital technology and a minimalist crew. Blum understood that horror could thrive on limited resources, allowing the film to be produced on spec and then sold to studios for a much higher profit margin. Innovating the Found Footage Style Paranormal Activity took the found footage concept to new heights, integrating home security cameras into its narrative. This innovative approach grounded the horror in a relatable setting, evoking classic fears of the unknown—what lurks in the shadows or waits beneath the bed. By focusing on the gradual psychological deterioration of its characters, Micah and Katie, the film created a sense of realism that resonated deeply with audiences. The film’s clever use of suspense, rather than overt scares, allowed for a slow build-up that kept viewers on edge. Peli employed stationary cameras and a unique shooting technique called “retroscripting,” where the actors were given outlines of scenes to improvise around. This led to an authentic feel, even though it made the editing process more challenging. From Festivals to Box Office Success After completing the film, Peli began showcasing it at various film festivals in 2007. His hard work paid off when an agent at CAA took notice. Following this, Paranormal Activity caught the attention of DreamWorks, which initially planned to re-shoot the film with a bigger budget. However, after a test screening revealed that audiences were leaving the theater due to sheer terror, the studio decided to stick with the original version. Paramount Pictures eventually acquired the film’s distribution rights and orchestrated additional shooting to create alternative endings. After years of development and test screenings, Paranormal Activity was released to the public in 2009, where it quickly became a major hit, spawning six sequels and paving the way for Blumhouse Productions as a powerhouse in the film industry. Conclusion Paranormal Activity not only changed the landscape of horror films but also demonstrated the potential of low-budget filmmaking. With its innovative techniques and captivating storytelling, it redefined what was possible in the genre and solidified Jason Blum’s place in Hollywood history. Today, Paranormal Activity remains a benchmark for aspiring filmmakers and a testament to the power of creativity in cinema. You can catch the film streaming on Max.

Read More
tom holland as spider man

Tom Holland Teases a Unique Direction for Spider-Man 4

Excitement is building for Spider-Man 4, and Tom Holland recently shared some intriguing insights about the forthcoming installment in the beloved superhero franchise. During a recent appearance on Good Morning America, Holland discussed the film’s development and hinted at what fans might expect from this new chapter. A Fresh Take on the Spider-Man Story When asked about Spider-Man 4, Holland offered limited details but emphasized that the creative team is taking the story in a direction that is both “a little different” and “crazy.” He expressed confidence that audiences will appreciate this new approach, saying, “The idea is crazy… I think the fans are gonna really respond to it.” His enthusiasm suggests that the filmmakers are aiming to surprise viewers with fresh elements and concepts. Production Timeline In a follow-up appearance on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, Holland confirmed that production for Spider-Man 4 is set to begin next year. While specific plot details remain under wraps, fans are eagerly awaiting more information about the storyline and additional cast members, aside from Holland himself. New Leadership Behind the Camera In September, director Destin Daniel Cretton was reportedly in negotiations to helm Spider-Man 4, stepping in for Jon Watts, who directed the previous trilogy featuring Holland’s Spider-Man. Cretton is well-known for his work on Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings and was briefly attached to direct Avengers: The Kang Dynasty before exiting. His involvement could bring a fresh perspective to the Spider-Man franchise, potentially influencing its tone and direction. Holland’s Busy Schedule The planned summer start for filming aligns well with Holland’s other commitments, as he is also set to star alongside Matt Damon in Christopher Nolan’s upcoming project, a follow-up to Oppenheimer. This opportunity allows Holland to explore diverse roles while continuing to grow his career in Hollywood. As fans eagerly await more news about Spider-Man 4, Holland’s comments suggest that this next installment could deliver a unique experience, blending the familiar charm of the beloved character with innovative storytelling. Whether it’s through new characters, plot twists, or stylistic changes, Spider-Man 4 has the potential to captivate audiences in ways that previous films may not have. With production on the horizon, the excitement surrounding this project is sure to continue building.

Read More
The Franchise

HBO’s “The Franchise” Delivers a Sharp Critique of Blockbuster Culture

HBO’s The Franchise has taken a bold step in its latest episode, “Scene 54: The Lilac Ghost,” offering a biting commentary on the current state of Hollywood and its treatment of blockbuster filmmaking. Centered around the tumultuous production of a superhero movie, this episode showcases Katherine Waterston’s character, Quinn, who finds herself increasingly disillusioned with the project as studio mandates reshape her role. A Harsh Reflection on Hollywood In this episode, Quinn grapples with a “girl problem” that the studio believes it can solve with minimal effort. This satirical take highlights the industry’s superficial attempts to address gender representation, ultimately reflecting the dangers posed to real individuals caught in the crossfire of studio decisions. The narrative serves as a critique of how actors, particularly women, are often treated as mere pawns in an industry driven by profit rather than genuine storytelling. Examining Gender Politics in Blockbusters The Franchise does not shy away from exploring the darker realities of gender dynamics in Hollywood. Quinn’s character reveals the mental toll that fan abuse has taken on her, showcasing the emotional challenges actors face, especially those who encounter hostility from toxic fanbases. As she confides in her colleague Anita, it becomes clear that Quinn’s struggles are not just personal but emblematic of a broader industry issue. The episode underscores the disconnection between studio executives and the real-world impacts of their decisions. When Quinn’s character undergoes superficial changes aimed at making her more appealing to fans, the result is a backlash that doesn’t add depth to her role but instead subjects the actress to online harassment, including death threats. A Mirror to Real-Life Experiences The series draws parallels with real-world incidents where actresses, particularly women of color, have faced backlash for their roles in major franchises. The experiences of stars from shows like The Acolyte and the Star Wars franchise are echoed in Quinn’s narrative, as the show addresses the pervasive culture of toxicity that many actors endure. Executive Accountability What makes The Franchise particularly incisive is its critique of the executives at the helm of these projects. While the director and co-stars are depicted as self-absorbed, it’s the studio leaders who ultimately dictate the terms, pushing for changes without understanding their implications. Characters like Bryson, who offer hollow support, and Pat, who embodies outright misogyny, illustrate the industry’s failures to protect its talent. By shifting the focus onto these decision-makers, The Franchise effectively critiques the superficiality of their claims to be allies. The executives celebrate their initiatives to empower women while remaining oblivious to the real dangers that their actions impose on the very individuals they claim to uplift. Conclusion In The Franchise, the blend of dark comedy and poignant drama serves as a powerful critique of the Hollywood system. By exposing the disconnect between studio executives and the realities faced by actors, particularly women, the show presents a nuanced perspective on the challenges inherent in the industry today. This episode stands out as one of the most biting commentaries on the failings of blockbuster filmmaking, making a compelling case for deeper change in Hollywood.

Read More
Back To Top